Derby 1 Hull 2: Abdoulaye Faye scores winner

Derby 1 Hull 2: Bruce is back on top as Faye winner fires up Tigers

|

UPDATED:

23:27 GMT, 21 December 2012

Steve Bruce brushed aside any thoughts of personal vindication as his Hull side jumped into the Championship’s promotion places.

The genial Geordie was facing life on the managerial scrapheap 12 months ago after being dumped by Sunderland.

But Bruce is not a man to sit licking his wounds for long. After four away victories on the trot only Cardiff are looking down on his team – and that by virtue of a superior goal difference.

Winner: Faye (second right) wheels away after scoring

Winner: Faye (second right) wheels away after scoring

MATCH FACTS

Derby: Legzdins, Brayford, Keogh, O'Connor, Roberts (Davies 87), Coutts, Bryson, Hughes, Hendrick, Jacobs (Robinson 78), Sammon.

Subs Not Used: Fielding, Tyson, O'Brien, Gjokaj, Freeman.

Goals: Jacobs 45.

Hull: Jakupovic, Chester, Hobbs, Faye, Elmohamady, Quinn, Evans, Brady, Meyler, Koren (Cairney 89), Simpson (Proschwitz 76).

Subs Not Used: Amos, Rosenior, Mclean, McShane, Olofinjana.

Booked: Chester, Meyler, Evans.

Goals: Koren 25, Faye 50.

Attendance: 25,442

Referee: Darren Sheldrake (Surrey).

Latest Championship table, fixtures and results

This was, in many ways, a classic away
victory at a ground where Nigel Clough has made his energetic and
youthful Derby side a tough nut to crack.

Indeed, this game was wide open at the interval. Robert Koren marked his
100th appearance for Hull with a 25th-minute goal following a
well-worked move.

On the stroke of half time Derby midfielder Michael Jacobs scored his
first goal for the club after controlling neatly and thumping home a
25-yard volley.

But Abdoulaye Faye’s 50th-minute header from the outstanding Robbie
Brady’s corner earned the division’s best travellers their seventh away
win.

‘It’s been some year,’ said Bruce. ‘For me, it was just a case of
whether I had the appetite for it but you know me. I want to work and
obviously I’m pleased.

‘But I’m more pleased for my owners Assem and Ehab Allam. I think they
have pumped something like 60million into Hull City. The club would
already be in oblivion without them.

‘Outside of Hull, nobody seems to give a damn about us. We were 33-1
shots for promotion at the start of the season and we have not been on
the radar but in our “principality of Hull” we are doing OK.’

Opener: Robert Koren gave Hull a first-half lead

Opener: Robert Koren gave Hull a first-half lead

The charge has been levelled at Bruce that he was too stuck in the past
to embrace new methods. But clarity of thought has seen him deploy three
centre halves.

Derby, reborn themselves under Clough, had lost only once in their last
11 home games prior to this. Clough’s side, who look vastly times
improved from the indisciplined, injury-ravaged crew he inherited four
years ago, had already allowed their concentration to lapse and fallen
behind after 25 minutes with what was, effectively, Hull’s first effort
on target.

Jacobs’ cracker levelled on the stroke of half time but once Faye converted there was no way back for the hosts.

Bruce was magnanimous at the final whistle, conceding that Derby had made life difficult for his team in the first half.

Clough was encouraged, too. The Derby manager said: ‘We have now lost
only two games at Pride Park this season. We must be doing something
right.’

Judging by the Championship table, so must Bruce.

Rangers win tax appeal "in principle"

Murray vindicated as Rangers win tax appeal 'in principle' after majority verdict

By
Graeme Yorke

PUBLISHED:

20:43 GMT, 20 November 2012

|

UPDATED:

09:49 GMT, 21 November 2012

The tribunal which heard Rangers' appeal over their bill for the use of Employee Benefit Trusts has delivered a majority verdict allowing it 'in principle'.

The tax tribunal stated that the 'controversial monies received by the employees were not paid to them as their absolute entitlement'.

Rangers had argued that the payments, thought to be close to 49million, had been loans rather than wages and not subject to tax.

No verdict on any sum that the oldco Rangers were liable for was included in the findings, but Sir David Murray's company welcomed the verdict as vindication of their stance.

'In principle': Rangers' appeal was accepted by a majority verdict at the tax tribunal

'In principle': Rangers' appeal was accepted by a majority verdict at the tax tribunal

Oldco Rangers had previously stated they could be liable for up to 75million but the tribunal ruled that Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs assessment should be 'reduced substantially' with only some payments subject to tax.

'It was conceded that advances in favour of certain players are taxable and liable to NIC (National Insurance Contributions), and 35 we have found that, in certain other limited instances, there may be a similar liability.

'To that extent the assessments should stand. In these circumstances we expect that it is sufficient that we allow the appeal in principle.

Vindicated: Former Rangers director Paul Murray's company welcomed the news

Vindicated: Former Rangers director Paul Murray's company welcomed the news

'Parties can no doubt settle the sums due for the limited number of cases mentioned without further reference to the tribunal.'

Murray International Holdings, who were majority shareholders of the oldco club until Craig Whyte's takeover in May 2011, declared in a statement: 'We are satisfied that the Tax Tribunal has now published its widely awaited decision and note the contents thereof.

'We are pleased with the judgement which leaves minimal tax liability and overwhelmingly supports the views collectively and consistently held by our advisers, legal counsel and MIH itself.'

The decision does not affect the current football club at Ibrox, which was reconstituted as a new company when the oldco Rangers was consigned to liquidation in June.

New regime: Rangers' owner Charles Green

New regime: Rangers' owner Charles Green

MIH also called for an inquiry into the leaking of information surrounding the case.

A website devoted to the case won the Orwell Prize for blogging while a BBC documentary team won a Scottish BAFTA for their investigation into the payments.

The Murray statement continued: 'This has been an exceptionally long, difficult and expensive process involving not just the Tax Tribunal but also significant efforts to resolve the matter with senior HMRC officials on a commercially sensible basis for all parties.

'We will therefore review the detailed content of the decision with our advisers and legal counsel to ascertain what action, if any, is now required by MIH.

'While MIH has at all times respected the privacy of the Tax Tribunal proceedings, a substantial quantity of confidential information relating to the case has become available for public consumption stimulating considerable discussion and often ill-informed debate.

'This has been wholly inappropriate and outwith the fundamental principles of natural justice.

'We therefore formally request that the relevant authorities investigate how these sensitive details have been released so widely.

Relegated: Rangers now play in the Scottish Third Division

Relegated: Rangers now play in the Scottish Third Division

'We have instructed our lawyers to retrospectively review online and printed publications relating to the case to identify whether legal redress is either appropriate or necessary.'

HMRC revealed they were thinking about mounting a challenge to the decision, which was supported by two of the judges, Kenneth Mure QC and Scott Rae, but opposed by the other, Dr Heidi Poon.

A statement from HMRC read: 'We are disappointed that we have lost this stage of the court process and we are considering an appeal.

'The decision was not unanimous and the diligence of HMRC investigators was acknowledged by the whole tribunal.

'HMRC is committed to tackling avoidance and it is right that we challenge the type of avoidance seen in this case.'

What does the verdict mean in layman's terms

In the vast majority of cases, the tribunal has found in favour of Rangers Football Club in that the payments to the individual players were loans and they were at the discretion of the trustees of the Employee Benefit Trust. Basically, they were determined to be loans, not remuneration. On that basis, there is no further tax payable in terms of PAYE or NI (National Insurance), as HMRC was claiming. It is indicated in the ruling that in some cases, a minority of cases, the tribunal found in favour of HMRC so in those cases it was determined that is was remuneration, not loans, and PAYE and NI should be paid. But that is in the minority – in that vast majority, the verdicts went in favour of Rangers.

WHO IS LIABLE FOR ANY MONEY OWED TO HMRC

In the majority of the cases, it would be Rangers oldco. If HMRC was unable to reclaim those monies from oldco, could it pursue individual players Maybe. But it would depend upon the individual circumstances of each player, what they've done on their tax returns. There is not a clear, uncomplicated route in terms of recovering money from the players. HMRC's primary is to go after oldco for those monies.

WILL HMRC GET ANY MONEY FROM OLDCO RANGERS

There is only a certain pot of money available via the liquidation route. For those sums that were discussed, it just increases by a small percentage how much of the overall pot goes to HMRC. By Duff and Phelps' estimate, about four months ago, they thought there might only be about 1million available via liquidation. They would just rank along with other creditors to get a proportion of that 1million pot so it's not going to make a huge difference to the overall pay-out that HMRC get. They were already due 25million-plus of VAT and PAYE that Craig Whyte didn't pay.

COULD ADMINISTRATION AND LIQUIDATION HAVE BEEN AVOIDED HAD THE VERDICT BEEN KNOWN BEFORE CRAIG WHYTE'S TAKEOVER IN MAY 2011

What actually put Rangers into administration was the fact that Craig Whyte didn't pay VAT and PAYE. It wasn't the big tax case, and I think that's a point worth stressing, it wasn't the big tax case that put Rangers into administration. I think the big tax case potentially had two influences. Firstly, when Sir David Murray was trying to sell the club, it could well have put off some potential buyers of the club because the big tax case was hanging over Rangers. Without it, maybe other buyers may have come along, buyers who might have been a better outcome for Rangers than Craig Whyte. Secondly, after Craig Whyte had actually bought it, was he influenced by the fact that the big tax case was there Did that influence the fact that he didn't pay VAT and PAYE and didn't put more money into club because maybe he thought he was going to lose the big tax case anyway Only Craig Whyte knows the answer to that. There were probably a couple of junctures where the big tax case may have influenced the final outcome of events.

WILL HMRC APPEAL

It's difficult to say. It was obviously a very complicated verdict, it was only a majority, it was 2-1, it wasn't unanimous. HMRC are clearly disappointed by the outcome. I think they will take their time and consider the likelihood of winning an appeal and the benefits of pursuing it further to try to get a favourable outcome.

David Haye v Dereck Chisora: British boxing will be damaged

Panto villains will do untold damage as Haye and Chisora finally meet in the ring

|

UPDATED:

21:31 GMT, 13 July 2012

Bring out the freaks and take away the fence. At a football ground in east London, a salesman with a granite chin will be sweating on David Haye and Dereck Chisora delivering a pantomime that somehow justifies all the commotion that went into making it happen.

If Frank Warren does a good job of filling Upton Park – 30,000 tickets had been sold as of Friday night for a ground capable of holding 40,000 – then the promoter who has done so much for British boxing will have all the vindication he believes is necessary for a fight with serious ramifications for the sport in this country.

‘People want to see this fight,’ has been his mantra from the start. He said it again this week, in between claims from Haye that he will be ‘judge, jury and executioner’ of a man he says has not been sufficiently punished in the law courts for ‘beating up his ex girlfriend and other transgressions’.

Keep your distance: David Haye (left) and Dereck Chisora weigh in

Keep your distance: David Haye (left) and Dereck Chisora weigh in

Enlarge

David Haye v Dereck Chisora

For his part, Chisora, curiously, has been saying he wants to ‘cut David’s hair off’. In the world of boxing, where spite sells and trash talk needs constant escalation, this grudge match is off the chart for a 10-rounder that is being billed as a bout for the ‘WBA and WBO international titles’. So are the purses, with Haye understood to be pocketing around 2.5million and Chisora at least half a million.

But for Warren, who is not the show’s official promoter but has put his fingerprints all over it, ticket sales, subscriptions to the BoxNation television channel and the likelihood of a dramatic fight surely cannot justify the means.

Civil war has raged in British boxing since it was announced on May 8 that Chisora and Haye will finish in London what they shamefully started with a brawl at a press conference in Munich in February.

Trim: Haye weighed in at 210lbs, 37lbs lighter than his opponent Chisora

Trim: Haye weighed in at 210lbs, 37lbs lighter than his opponent Chisora

Trim: Haye weighed in at 210lbs, 37lbs lighter than his opponent Chisora

The fact that neither was licensed to fight in this country – Haye’s having been relinquished when he retired in 2011 and Chisora’s withdrawn by the British Boxing Board of Control for that brawl – was sidestepped by the unearthing of Luxembourg’s boxing federation and their willingness to sanction the bout. The ingenuity of those involved is regrettably impressive.

Of course, there’s nothing illegal about this fight, but the morality of navigating around the BBBC’s punishment and profiting from such an appalling scrap is vulnerable to serious questioning. Sportsmail has raised several and Warren has not liked it one bit.

The consequences of this match When the legal threats stop bouncing between Warren, the BBBC and Luxembourg we will have a clearer idea.

But the days of having one organisation – albeit a flawed one – running all meaningful professional boxing in this country seem numbered. In an already fragmented sport that is not a good thing.

The punch that stated it all: Haye (right) brawled with Chisora in Munich

The punch that stated it all: Haye (right) brawled with Chisora in Munich

‘Forget the politics,’ Haye said after the announcement. That will be hard if future BBBC punishments hold no water and there is, for argument’s sake, a Luxembourg Boxing Federation British champion in each division.

The fight itself is actually intriguing. Chisora is a far more accomplished heavyweight than he is given credit for, as he showed in taking Vitali Klitschko the distance on the night it all kicked off in February.

He weighed in on Thursday more than two stones heavier than Haye, who at 210lbs, is at his lightest since he was the unified champion of the cruiserweights.

‘Chisora can only fight one way and that is to come forward,’ Haye said on Wednesday. ‘I hope for his sake that he tries something new because when he does what I think he will do he will walk on to something huge.’

Previous: Chisora impressed against Vitali Klitschko in their title fight

Previous: Chisora impressed against Vitali Klitschko in their title fight

Chisora certainly has the authentic heavyweight power to hurt Haye if – and it’ s a big if – he proves he has the craft to get up close, but punch resistance was one of the few areas in which Haye took credit from his retirement-inducing defeat to Wladimir Klitschko last year.

His trainer, Adam Booth, said: ‘In the sixth, there was a shot that Wladimir put all his weight into, got a full shoulder turn and got his weight on to the front leg – the shot I was worried about – and he took it fine. David is not chinny.’

Haye’s movement should be the deciding factor, enabling him to evade Chisora’s attacks before advancing on the likely openings. ‘This fight will be won by knock out,’ Haye said.

Let’s hope so, whichever way it goes. They have agreed a bet whereby a knockout victim has to make a 20,000 donation to the other’s charity. At least then something positive can come from all this.

Martin Samuel: Hodgson makes profit on the big issue

Hodgson makes profit on the big issue

PUBLISHED:

22:09 GMT, 15 June 2012

|

UPDATED:

00:11 GMT, 16 June 2012

At England's centre of progressive thinking, they will teach that small is beautiful. Small pitches, small teams, small passes, even small players.

The technical masters produced by Barcelona's La Masia academy are the inspiration for the next generation.

On Friday night in Kiev was not about that, though.

On the slide: Ashley Cole beats Seb Larsson to the ball

On the slide: Ashley Cole beats Seb Larsson to the ball

It was about big men, literally and
figuratively. Big men up front, big men at the back. Big men in the
dressing-room, big men under pressure.

Big was the new small in the Olympic Stadium.

And big turned out beautiful for England.

When Andy Carroll rose to place a
wondrous, textbook header past Sweden goalkeeper Andreas Isaksson it
seemed a tiny triumph for unfashionable thinking.

When Danny Welbeck pirouetted
perfectly to score the winning goal with 12 minutes remaining, Roy
Hodgson got his ultimate vindication.

That's for openers: Andy Carroll (obscured) heads past Andreas Isaksson

That's for openers: Andy Carroll (obscured) heads past Andreas Isaksson

It is over a decade since an England
manager sent two such physically imposing strikers out to play 4-4-2 in
an international match, Kevin Keegan partnering Alan Shearer and Emile
Heskey in a goalless draw with Argentina prior to the 2000 European
Championship.

But Hodgson went back to the future, and somehow it worked. Not like clockwork, obviously, but then what did we expect

This was Sweden after all, the nation that had never lost to England in a competitive match.

So it was a mess of a game, a scrap, a scramble, swinging viciously one way, then the other.

Sharp-shooter: Theo Walcott (left) brought England back to 2-2

Sharp-shooter: Theo Walcott (left) brought England back to 2-2

There were five goals and each one
changed the state of play: England ahead, Sweden level, Sweden ahead,
England level – and finally, preciously, England ahead.

Yet if the end justifies the means, then chalk this one up to Hodgson.

He thought he knew a way to beat Sweden with two six-foot strikers, both men scored and the match was won.

He knew he had to inspire a revival
at 2-1 down, he introduced Theo Walcott and the antithesis of the
battering ram striker changed the game.

Job done: Hodgson accords himself a moment of satisfaction

Job done: Hodgson accords himself a moment of satisfaction after a game that gave him plenty to ponder

Job done: Hodgson accords himself a moment of satisfaction after a game that gave him plenty to ponder

It was Walcott's first international
goal since that famous night in Zagreb but when did England's progress
in tournaments ever run predictably; or smoothly

At half-time England were coasting,
by the hour they were going out and with 10 minutes remaining many of
the travelling fans were looking to extend their stay to the
quarterfinals.

It was a game that reminded of
2004's last eight encounter with Portugal in its frantic craziness, with
one small difference: for once, England won.

When Hodgson announced his intention to play Carroll with Welbeck there was a definite groan from the purists.

Great Scott: Midfield dynamo Scott Parker challenges Andreas Granqvist for possession in Kiev

Great Scott: Midfield dynamo Scott Parker challenges Andreas Granqvist for possession in Kiev

And yet, what has to be accepted is that England's manager is not a primitive man.

If his tactics were retro, the thinking behind them was modern.

This is a manager that will not alight on a favoured XI, that will always consider the opponent.

He fancied Carroll against Sweden's
defence. And he was dead right. Carroll's presence dominated the
first-half and if England's defenders had been as resilient in repelling
dead balls, the second-half would not have been such a train wreck in
parts, either.

Big men are what Sweden fear. Big men who can head the ball. Andriy Shevchenko proved that in the first group game on Monday.

And while Carroll may never have Shevchenko's repertoire as a striker, he certainly knows how to meet a cross.

Clash of the titans: Terry sends Ibrahimovic into orbit

Clash of the titans: Terry sends Ibrahimovic into orbit

Clash of the titans: Terry sends Ibrahimovic into orbit

When he converted a vicious flat one
from Steven Gerrard – it could have been David Beckham in his prime out
there – it confirmed Hodgson's hunch.

His next team sheet, however, will be equally important.

Will Carroll get another game after frightening the life out of Sweden Not necessarily.

Wayne Rooney is back and Hodgson will already have an idea on who will serve him best as a partner.

England's tactics against Sweden may
have been straightforward, but the manager cannot afford to be one
dimensional in such a fiercely competitive tournament.

Talking tactics: Hodgson makes a point to Welbeck (right) and Carroll

Talking tactics: Hodgson makes a point to Welbeck (right) and Carroll

Hodgson is in credit after this,
though, even if at 2-1 down the cameras revealed his face crumpled in
all too familiar anguish.

The best manager s solve problems and that is what he did after Sweden went ahead.

He introduced Walcott in the hope of affecting the game, and the Arsenal man did that, and more.

The equalising goal and the cross for Welbeck's winner represents his finest contribution in close to four years.

Sometimes a big man doesn't have to walk tall.

Yet whatever lessons appear to have
been learned in Kiev – and the first is that Hodgson is building
character – what must also be remembered is that this was not a typical
game of international football.

Old fashioned way: Andy Carroll gave Sweden kittens with his physicality

Old fashioned way: Andy Carroll gave Sweden kittens with his physicality

Old fashioned way: Andy Carroll gave Sweden kittens with his physicality

What worked against Sweden, certainly in the first-half, may not be as successful on other occasions.

Here were two teams playing to the most English of blueprints, and only one was wearing the Football Association's crest.

Sweden were England, but not quite as strong.

They shaped up the same way, applied
the same principles, remained as rigidly in formation, they scored from
set pieces as England did against France.

They did everything that England did, in fact; but just not quite as well.

What Sweden lacked, most crucially, was Carroll.

Old fashioned methods require an old
fashioned centre-forward and while those who love the aesthetic thrill
of a grounded, passing game may recoil in horror from the sight of an
England team playing to Carroll's strengths, there is no single way to
win a game of football.

Even Arsene Wenger once talked of
Emmanuel Adebayor giving Arsenal something different, because it allowed
them to play the ball up to a big man if they were being thwarted in
midfield.

And there was nothing crude about
Didier Drogba's performances for Chelsea in Europe last season. Playing
back to goal, imposing physically on central defenders who pride
themselves on being the hardest men on the field, is an art form, too.

Hoodoo ended: Danny Welbeck (left) somehow gets the ball past Sweden's goalkeeper Andreas Isaksson (right)

Hoodoo ended: Danny Welbeck (left) somehow gets the ball past Sweden's goalkeeper Andreas Isaksson (right)

There will be plenty of team here
who will look at what Carroll did to Sweden early on, and shudder;
plenty of defenders who do not relish the sheer physical threat he
poses, the way few batsmen genuinely enjoy facing proper fast bowling.

Even so, it is far from over. If
last night's atmosphere was tense, imagine it with the volume up to 11
in the Donbass Arena next week.

England may only need a draw but Ukraine will go through if they win and it promises to be a tense, torrid night.

Ambition is key here, though, because
a quarter-final clash with Spain could be avoided if England win,
depending on the margin. It is time to stay strong: and think big.

Sheffield Wednesday having a hoot: MICHAEL WALKER

On the road… Owls having a hoot as Megson sacking is given vindication

|

UPDATED:

22:00 GMT, 6 May 2012

Some sights and sounds of Sheffield Wednesday on Saturday:

David Blunkett's beaming face as he sat in the directors’ box, headphones on and his team winningthe scoreboard showing ‘Schhhhh’ just before revealing that Exeter were 1-0 up on Sheffield Uniteda quite blistering version of ‘Hi-ho Sheffield Wednesday’ at kick-off from 38,000 bouncing home fansa response of ‘Sorry mate, it sold out in 20 minutes,’ at the station to a request for a Green ’Un.

This was a good day at Hillsborough. Given the lack of them over the past dozen years, it will only be begrudged by Blades fans who now face the play-offs. Neither Sheffield Wednesday, nor United, should be in the Third Division.

Pure delight: Sheffield Wednesday secured automatic promotion to the Championship at the expense of their city rivals United, two years after dropping down

Pure delight: Sheffield Wednesday secured automatic promotion to the Championship at the expense of their city rivals United, two years after dropping down

Pure delight: Sheffield Wednesday secured automatic promotion to the Championship at the expense of their city rivals United, two years after dropping down

And now one of them isn’t.

At 4.15 someone in the main stand started throwing pre-printed T-shirts with ‘Championship’ on them. It was presumably meant as a statement of return. But it said something else. It said where Wednesday have been — League One — for the past two seasons.

The Owls finished 15th last May, six places below Rochdale. Last season also featured an attendance of 24,000 less than Saturday’s.

In November 2010, it featured the latest winding-up order over 1.8million of unpaid tax. But it featured Milan Mandaric, too.

Ironically, considering the court case he was involved in with Harry Redknapp in January, Mandaric paid that 1.8m as part of his takeover and struck a deal with the Co-op Bank over an estimated 26m debt.

Alan Irvine was manager. He gave way to Gary Megson, who was dismissed 66 days before Saturday. Wednesday were third in the table then, two points off United having played two games more. Dave Jones came in and as he said after this 10th victory in 12 games: ‘That was a big call by the chairman.’

Credit where it's due: Dave Jones came in midway through the season

Credit where it's due: Dave Jones came in midway through the season

It was vindicated by the scenes here but if Megson is bitter, you could see why. Megson sent a message of support to his former players, but not to Jones, and Megson deserves some credit — Wednesday won the most home games in the division and 11, of 16, were won under him.

But Mandaric and Jones have justification. Mandaric said he received congratulations from Redknapp and the chairman was happy to forward goodwill to Jones: ‘David Jones is a good man, a solid man.’

He also said, of that court case: ‘I was very much humiliated. It hurt me more because I’d never experienced that. I thought, “Maybe this is not for me, maybe it’s my time to move on”.’

But, now 73, Mandaric will stay. Saturday would energise anyone and Mandaric was given an ovation midway through the second half.

Helping hand: Nile 'loan' Ranger

Helping hand: Nile 'loan' Ranger

BY THE WAY…

Sheffield United are to appeal against
James Beattie’s red card at Exeter. They are already missing top scorer
Ched Evans. The Blades finished 17 points ahead of Stevenage but now
meet them in the play-offs. You can see why some United fans are
anxious.

‘The most important thing is trust,’ he said. ‘It was great to receive it. I got it at Portsmouth. I didn’t get it because I’m a handsome guy, I got it because I said on the very first day that I’m accountable.’

But football is good at forgetting. No-one mentioned winding-up orders, it is all about what happens next.

The examples of Norwich and Southampton, who have both gone from League One to the Premier League in two seasons, were put to Mandaric, who replied: ‘The club belongs to the top 10 in the country. There’s a lot of hard work to be done. Whether I’m the one to take it the whole way there remains to be seen.

‘But this club has one direction and if those other clubs have done it, why can’t we This club is not smaller than those. We have a bursting desire to be there.

‘This club deserves to be in the Premier League. It might take one, two or three years, but we’ve established the route. It has to happen.’

Jones did not look like a man under pressure to deliver. There is some realism. The team had four loan players in it, including the two scorers Michail Antonio (Reading) and Nile Ranger (Newcastle United).

But after so many years without it, Wednesday have momentum. It was a day to talk the talk. As Jones said: ‘I ain’t come here just to consolidate.’

Striking examples of Madine

Given the Premier League season that Grant Holt has just had at Norwich, Danny Graham at Swansea and what Southampton’s Rickie Lambert could do come August, there is a striking template for Sheffield Wednesday’s Gary Madine to follow.

Centre of attention: Gary Madine has been a revelation for Wednesday this term

Centre of attention: Gary Madine has been a revelation for Wednesday this term

Madine is 21 and from Gateshead. He began at Carlisle United — as a 17-year-old he made his debut coming on for Graham. Last January he joined Wednesday for 800,000 and this season he has 18 goals in 36 league games.

On Saturday Madine won everything. Madine has two good feet and is brave in the air. He is not dissimilar to Wolves’ Steven Fletcher, though Madine could be said to have ‘an edge’ the Scotsman does not.

Mackay: Don't write us off yet

The last time West Ham boss Sam Allardyce and assistant Neil McDonald took a team into the Barclays Premier League through the play-offs — in 2001 ' their Bolton side and the other two promoted clubs stayed up the following season.

It has not happened since, although it could this season if QPR survive the drop. But McDonald, whose side face Cardiff at home on Monday for a place in the play-off final, believes if West Ham can join promoted Reading and Southampton, then all three have the quality to stay up.

Deficit: Malky Mackay hasn't given up on Cardiff City's promotion dream

Deficit: Malky Mackay hasn't given up on Cardiff City's promotion dream

The Hammers are 2-0 ahead after Thursday’s first leg but are not taking anything for granted and know two massive games stand in their way of promotion.

But McDonald, 46, told Sportsmail: ‘It happened when we were at Bolton so it can be done. There’s no reason why the three teams, obviously Reading and Southampton and whoever else goes up, can’t do it. That’s an aspiration. We dominated the majority of the game on Thursday and we’re going to try to dominate the second leg to progress.’

Cardiff manager Malky Mackay insisted getting the first goal was crucial to his side’s chances. He said: ‘Most people may expect West Ham to make it through but myself and the team don’t subscribe to that.’

The winners will face Blackpool or Birmingham in the final at Wembley on Saturday week. Blackpool are 1-0 up.

TV: Sky Sports 1 from 4.30pm.

Lotus lose protest against Mercedes rear wing in China

Lotus lose protest against Mercedes' controversial rear wing ahead of China race

|

UPDATED:

16:02 GMT, 12 April 2012

The four-man panel of FIA stewards have dismissed Lotus' protest against Mercedes' innovative rear wing.

The protest related to the conformity of the Mercedes cars under article 3.15 of the FIA technical regulations, that 'any system, device or procedure which uses driver movement as a means of altering the aerodynamic characteristics of the car is prohibited'.

Mercedes' device is incorporated into the DRS, the drag reduction system that assists overtaking at given points on a circuit and is activated by a driver.

Pushing boundaries: Mercedes have caused controversy with their rear wing

Pushing boundaries: Mercedes have caused controversy with their rear wing

The design, which according to team principal Ross Brawn is independent of the DRS, stalls the front and rear wings, providing additional downforce and in turn extra straight-line speed.

Lotus claimed the system was illegal as it makes use of driver movement when the DRS is activated, however, following a lengthy stewards' meeting at the Shanghai International Circuit ahead of this weekend's Chinese Grand Prix, it has been declared legal.

Mercedes are now free to use the system this weekend, although all parties have been reminded of their right to appeal. Lotus confirmed, however, that they will not appeal.

China challenge: Mercedes driver Michael Schumacher in Shanghai on Thursday

China challenge: Mercedes driver Michael Schumacher in Shanghai on Thursday

Lotus technical director James Allison posed five questions to his FIA counterpart Charlie Whiting and the stewards he felt believed needed answering in relation to the Mercedes system.

In their conclusion, the stewards deemed not all the questions could 'be answered in the affirmative and therefore do not form successful grounds for upholding of the protest'.

The decision will serve as vindication to Brawn, who earlier today said he remained at a loss to understand why so much fuss was being made.

'It's disappointing that after three races we're still in this situation,' said Brawn. 'The system hasn't changed, the FIA's position hasn't changed and, as far as I understand, their argument hasn't changed.'

Asked as to why he felt teams were still disputing it, Brawn added: 'I don't know. It's a bit of a puzzle.

F1 is in town: Lotus driver Romain Grosjean signs autographs in Shanghai

F1 is in town: Lotus driver Romain Grosjean signs autographs in Shanghai

'Obviously there are benefits in the system. Lotus have been quoted as saying they've a 0.2secs upgrade for here, well, I can promise you our system doesn't give us 0.2secs.

'In particular in the race because it can only be used when we overtake someone.

'So the amount of effort and time that has gone into it (in terms of the complaining) appears to be disproportionate. It does seem to be a strange situation.'

Brawn maintains the DRS and the additional system are 'quite independent', and was initially passed two years ago.

'In 2010 Charlie stated such a system was legal. It's in the minutes of the Technical Working Group meetings,' said Brawn. 'He stated his opinion then that he considered it legal, so it has not just been going on for three races, but for two years.'