Portsmouth face 10 point deduction even if supporters trust save club

Pompey will still be docked 10 points if supporters group win fight to save club

|

UPDATED:

17:13 GMT, 10 December 2012

Portsmouth still face a 10-point deduction should the Pompey Supporters' Trust (PST) win their battle to save the club this week.

The Football League today confirmed the sanction, to be imposed once the club comes out of administration, after receiving details of the PST's proposed takeover.

PST's bid hinges on administrators PKF gaining permission to sell Fratton Park, which is controlled by the club's former owner Balram Chainrai, at a High Court hearing which starts on Thursday.

In danger: Portsmouth will be docked 10 points even if the supporters trust saves the club

In danger: Portsmouth will be docked 10 points even if the supporters trust saves the club

The League is awaiting the outcome of that hearing, and for the trust to raise the remaining funds as set out in their business plan, before fully considering their application.

A statement from the League read: 'The Football League Board has received details of a proposal by Pompey Supporters' Trust and its partner investors to acquire the assets and certain liabilities of Portsmouth Football Club.

'Having considered the proposal in detail, the Board concluded that it had significant merit.

'However, two outstanding points will have to be resolved before the Board can fully consider PST's application to become the new owner of Portsmouth Football Club.

'They are the outcome of the current High Court proceedings relating to the ownership of Fratton Park and PST raising the remaining funding from supporters that is anticipated in its business plan.

'The Board also confirmed that ongoing membership of the League would be subject to a number of conditions that seek to ensure the sporting integrity of league football and the financial viability of the club going forward.

'It therefore reaffirmed its earlier decision that these conditions would include a deduction of 10 points (applicable at the point of transfer of share) and a range of other restrictions on playing budgets and future borrowing for the next four seasons.'

Pompey, who have been in administration since February, are currently one place and one point outside the npower League One relegation zone.

Mark Clattenburg Chelsea saga: Referee"s board to drop compensation claim

Referee's board to drop Clattenburg compensation claim over Chelsea saga

|

UPDATED:

10:25 GMT, 4 December 2012

The Professional Game Match Officials are set to drop their compensation claim against Chelsea over the Mark Clattenburg saga.

The 39-year-old was cleared by the Metropolitan Police and the Football Association after the European champions accused him of racially abusing John Obi Mikel during the controversial clash against Manchester United October 28.

End of the matter: The Professional Game Match Officials are set to drop their compensation claim against Chelsea over the Mark Clattenburg saga

End of the matter: The Professional Game Match Officials are set to drop their compensation claim against Chelsea over the Mark Clattenburg saga

The PGMOL have been contemplating the idea of pursing a compensation case against the Blues on behalf of Clattenburg, despite the fact the referee has indicated he has no intention of pressing ahead with a personal claim.

But the organisation look likely to decide against seeking cash from Chelsea fearing it would effect the integrity of referees.

Charles Green defiant after winning disrepute case against SPL

Green defiant: Rangers chief hits out at SPL after beating disrepute rap

|

UPDATED:

22:14 GMT, 4 October 2012

Charles Green won his latest battle with the football authorities on Thursday night before insisting it was time for the SPL to think again about their treatment of Rangers.

The Ibrox chief executive made a personal appearance at Hampden and was cleared of disrepute charges when an SFA Judicial Panel delivered a not-proven verdict.

Green had been accused of questioning the integrity of the SPL Commission — headed by Lord Nimmo Smith — set up to decide whether Rangers were guilty of improper payments to players when operating an Employee Benefit Trust scheme.

Winning: Charles Green emerged victorious

Winning: Charles Green emerged victorious

The Yorkshireman is now ready to meet with SFA president Campbell Ogilvie to try to build a constructive new relationship with the association.

Yet he remains deeply unhappy with the SPL over their EBT investigation, which could potentially lead to Rangers being stripped of titles.

Green has refused to co-operate with the Commission, due to convene again next month, and claims the lingering issue has damaged attempts to rebuild the club following its financial meltdown and plunge into the Third Division.

‘Perhaps it is now time that those people within the SPL who have been pursuing Rangers at every turn take stock,’ said Green.

‘As a member of the SFA, we want to work constructively within its structure and hope that all parties and organisations can take a view that what is of paramount importance is the good of the game.

‘To that end, we will be meeting with SFA President Campbell Ogilvie in the near future.

‘We want to be a force for good in football and it is surely to the benefit of all that the way forward is not frustrated by continually trying to look back.’

In a statement on the Rangers website last month, Green described the SPL Commission as ‘fundamentally misconceived’.

Fancy seeing you here: Former Rangers goalkeeper Bobby Brown (right) meets current No 1 Neil Alexander at the Scottish League Cup quarter-final draw

Fancy seeing you here: Former Rangers goalkeeper Bobby Brown (right) meets current No 1 Neil Alexander at the Scottish League Cup quarter-final draw

He also attacked the ‘breathtaking hypocrisy’ of the SPL, claiming deals over the EBT issue were on the table in the summer as part of a plan to have Rangers back in one of the top two divisions.

While insisting he was not questioning the impartiality of the Commission members, Green also said whatever decision they reached would be a ‘decision of the SPL’.

‘I am pleased the judicial panel accepted today that I had not brought the game into disrepute,’ added Green.

‘What I said, I said in good faith and I was speaking up for the interests of Rangers.

‘To be critical of the SPL’s handling of the EBT issue, does not mean that I am showing disrespect for the game and that view appears to have been shared by the judicial panel.

Looking up: Rangers are pushing for promotion

Looking up: Rangers are pushing for promotion

‘It is my hope that we can all move on from today and start working constructively for the good of the game.

‘The creation of the EBT Commission by the SPL following the events of the summer and the club’s attempts at constructive discussion has been particularly difficult for those of us who are new to Rangers and are trying to rebuild the club.

‘It appears for all the world to be yet another obstacle being placed in our path as we try to rebuild a great Scottish sporting institution.

‘I am the first person to accept that there are people who have been associated with Rangers who have brought the game into disrepute, particularly the previous regime, whose delinquent approach to paying taxes triggered a series of events that brought the club to the brink of destruction.

‘The consortium I led came to the table with one objective in mind: to save Rangers Football Club and rebuild what is a great sporting institution.’

Roberto Martinez ponders appeal over 10,000 fine

Martinez weighs up appeal over 10k fine for referee rant after Wigan's loss at Man United

|

UPDATED:

10:38 GMT, 4 October 2012

Wigan manager Roberto Martinez is considering whether to appeal against his 10,000 fine for criticising a referee.

Martinez was this week found guilty of misconduct by the Football Association over comments which suggested Michael Oliver was biased after his side's 4-0 defeat at Manchester United last month.

The Spaniard, who was angered by a number of decisions in the Barclays Premier League game, accepts his remarks could have been interpreted that way but feels he was misconstrued.

Decision time: Roberto Martinez is considering his next move

Decision time: Roberto Martinez is considering his next move

Martinez said: 'We have had the hearing and now we are waiting (to see) if we can appeal the decision because it is something I don't agree with.

'At the moment it is one of those situations you have to accept but we will look into the written outcome and see if we can appeal it.

'If you see the comments they are not disrespectful comments at all to the referee.

'I wasn't talking about the referee, I was talking about the figure of the referee in those certain games.

'I was talking about the experience that we at Wigan Athletic have had going away from home and unfortunately the calls we have had of late.

'I would never question the integrity of the referee or question if the referee was biased towards a decision.'

Martinez said in the aftermath of the game that it felt as though his side were 'fighting against a mountain'.

United's Danny Welbeck was awarded a penalty early in the game which Martinez felt was 'as bad a decision as you are going to see in the Premier League'.

Flashpoint: Martinez said Danny Welbeck dived to win a penalty

Flashpoint: Martinez said Danny Welbeck dived to win a penalty

He said at the time: 'I have come to United three times before today and for whatever reason we don't seem to be measured in the same manner as the team at home.

'In many ways, you feel as though you are fighting against a mountain.

'There were tackles flying around that if they had been the other way round there would have been a couple of red cards.'

Wigan expect to receive the written judgement from the FA on Friday and must make a decision regarding an appeal by Monday.

Man in the middle: Wigan were not happy when Michael Oliver awarded a penalty

Man in the middle: Wigan were not happy when Michael Oliver awarded a penalty

Joe Jogia banned from snooker after betting investigation

Snooker star Jogia banned from game until 2014 after betting investigation

|

UPDATED:

22:49 GMT, 25 July 2012

Joe Jogia has been banned from snooker until the end of the 2014 World Championship after an investigation into suspicious betting patterns ahead of a Snooker Shoot-out match.

Jogia’s game against Matthew Selt at January’s event was investigated by the sport’s governing body, the World Professional Billiards and Snooker Association (WPBSA), and betting was suspended after a bookmaker reported it had been the subject of unusual betting patterns.

The 36-year-old was provisionally suspended and the WPBSA confirmed in a statement this evening: 'Joe Jogia was today banned from involvement in the game of snooker and billiards until the conclusion of the 2014 World Championship and ordered to pay 2,000 as a contribution towards the cost of the hearing and investigation of the case.'

Banned: Joe Jogia has been banned until 2014 after an investigation into irregular betting patterns

Banned: Joe Jogia has been banned until 2014 after an investigation into irregular betting patterns

Jogia was found to have breached section 2.1.4.1 of the WPBSA members’ rules.

The section states: 'it shall be a breach of these rules for a member to…engage in any conduct …that is corrupt or fraudulent, or creates an actual or apparent conflict of interest for the member, or otherwise risks impairing public confidence in the integrity and/or the honest and orderly conduct of the tour and/or any tournament or match.'

WPBSA chairman Jason Ferguson said: “In protecting the public image of our sport, the WPBSA has strong links with the gambling commission and the betting industry.

'The integrity of our sport is of paramount importance and today’s outcome highlights how seriously the WPBSA will treat such matters.'

Tonight’s WPBSA statement continued: 'The Disciplinary Committee of the WPBSA has today heard the case of Joe Jogia in relation to the suspicious betting patterns on his match with Matthew Selt that was due to take place at the Sky Snooker Shootout at Blackpool on Saturday 28th January 2012.

'It was alleged that a series of bets were placed on Matthew Selt to win this match and the pattern of betting was deemed to be suspicious. As a result betting was suspended on the match on the evening of 23rd January 2012.

'On 26th January 2012, Joe Jogia withdrew from the match citing an injury and the match did not take place.

'An investigation was conducted by the WPBSA which found that on and between 20th and 24th January 2012, a total of 19 bets were made or attempted, all at different betting shops in the Leicester area, on Matthew Selt winning this match against Joe Jogia.

'Fourteen bets to a total value of 4,830 were placed and four bets to a total of 2,300 and one bet of an unknown amount were declined.

'It was established that the two persons placing the bets were known to Joe Jogia as associates and telephone records demonstrate that in the period leading up to and following the placing of bets Joe Jogia was in repeated contact with them.

'There was no contact prior to 16th January 2012 then he sent 33 text messages and made three calls to one of the persons placing the bets and 42 text messages and one call to the other. Joe has failed to provide a consistent or detailed explanation as to the reason for the contact.

'Initially, Joe Jogia claimed that the reason for the betting must be that people were aware of an injury that he had suffered, but four of the suspicious bets were placed before he claimed to have suffered the injury and a further seven of the bets were placed before he sought medical attention.

'Although there was no evidence to show that Joe Jogia would have gained financially, the Disciplinary Committee found that the frequency and timing of this contact, his lack of a consistent explanation for the contact and the suspicions raised by the pattern of bets placed by his associates created an actual or apparent conflict of interest for him as a member of the WPBSA, or otherwise risked impairing public confidence in the integrity of his match with Matthew Selt.'

Jogia, who before his ban tonight was ranked at number 57 in the world, was asked to provide a doctor’s note after his withdrawal from the match.

On May 30, he was issued with a provisional ban until today’s hearing, effectively barring him from competing for almost two months.

'I don’t feel the WPBSA are racist, but it is a complete and utter disgrace the way they have treated me,' Jogia, who is of Indian descent, told BBC Sport at the time.

'I am being made a scapegoat. The suspension means I am missing a lot of ranking points and prize money. I need to play.'

Sam Allardyce takes to Steve Kean to High Court over video rant

Allardyce takes Kean to the High Court after Blackburn boss' rant at old pal was caught on video

|

UPDATED:

14:14 GMT, 18 July 2012

Sam Allardyce is heading for a High Court showdown with Steve Kean over the Blackburn manager's video rant at his former boss.

West Ham chief Allardyce has issued a claim against his old club Blackburn and their manager over comments his successor at Ewood Park is alleged to have made about him.

Disgruntled fans from The BRFC Action Group claimed responsibility for posting a video clip of him on the club’s pre-season trip to Hong Kong last summer.

Speaking to supporters in a bar, Kean appeared to make unguarded comments about Allardyce in which he questions the integrity of the man who appointed him as first-team coach at Blackburn.

Scroll down to watch the rant – WARNING EXPLICIT LANGUAGE

Steve Kean

Sam Allardyce

Fall-out: Steve Kean (left) and his former boss Sam Allardyce

Video nasty: Kean was filmed by fans

Video nasty: Kean was filmed by fans

Allardyce instructed his
lawyers to sue Kean for slander. He is taking legal action against
Blackburn as well because Kean is an employee who was on club business
at the time.

Asked about
his relationship with Allardyce since he replaced him as manager in
December 2010, Kean is allegedly heard saying: ‘I haven’t spoken to him.
He mullered me so I said f*** him.

‘I worked my b***s off for him and then he had a go at me so f*** him.’

The
44-year-old Scot appears to claim the credit for Phil Jones’s emergence
from Blackburn’s academy before he was sold to Manchester United for
16.5million last summer, as well as telling the fans that his team
would finish in the top half of the table and win the Carling Cup.

Blackburn were eventually relegated from the Premier League and replaced by Allardyce’s West Ham this weekend.

DM.has('rcpv1639212336001','BCVideo');

Rangers: Ally McCoist respects decision to start in third division

Our journey back starts here, rallies McCoist as Rangers are dumped in bottom tier

|

UPDATED:

22:01 GMT, 13 July 2012

Ally McCoist insists he respects the decision of the Scottish Football League to force Rangers to begin life in the bottom tier.

The newco was voted in to the league by all but one of the clubs before 25 of the 30 elected to send them to the Third Division.

And McCoist had reportedly gone as far as to ask the assembled chairmen for the chance to begin again in the fourth tier.

Time to move on: Ally McCoist is pleased a decision has been made

Time to move on: Ally McCoist is pleased a decision has been made

‘I fully accept the decision of the SFL today and thank them for allowing us into the SFL,’ he said.

‘Clearly, starting from the bottom is not ideal and makes the task of rebuilding Rangers a longer one, but the SFL was placed in an impossible situation and I respect its decision.

‘I fully support the fans’ views that starting again in Division Three maintains the sporting integrity that the SPL clubs were so keen on.

‘The SPL clubs and the SFA have made their positions clear over the past few weeks and it remains to be seen what the long-term effects of their decisions will be.

‘Rangers have been severely punished for the actions of some individuals who previously ran the club and it will take time to recover. But we will come back stronger thanks to the loyalty of the fans and the commitment of everyone at Ibrox working tirelessly to bring back stability and success.’

Announcement: David Longmuir (centre) officially seals Rangers' fate

Announcement: David Longmuir (centre) officially seals Rangers' fate

As Rangers fans scan the road maps to Annan, Peterhead and the like, however, the tin lid has not quite been closed on this can of worms.

Charles Green still needs his Sevco company to obtain SFA membership before it can begin life down among the dead men. If suggestions that a condition of this will be to agree to take the historical punishments of the old club, then there is certainly an awkward hurdle yet to clear.

Seemingly, Green told the 30 chairmen that SFA membership would be granted only in the event of the club being pushed into the First Division. Quite why the block would be put on a club entering two divisions below is unclear, but it is hard to take issue with the Yorkshireman’s take that his club had now suffered the ‘ultimate punishment’.

There was widespread acceptance that not only had the correct decision been made, but it was also final.

Up in the air: Dundee Chief Executive Scott Gardiner arrives at Hampden

Up in the air: Dundee Chief Executive Scott Gardiner arrives at Hampden

A trip to Brechin or Forfar — depending on whether Dundee or Dunfermline are promoted to the SPL — on July 28 in the Ramsdens Cup (while Celtic entertain Inter Milan) will be Rangers’ first engagement as a Third Division club, followed on August 11 by their league bow at Peterhead, before a home match with East Stirlingshire a week later. It is beyond surreal.

Those who intend to follow, follow will rack up far more miles than they would have done in the SPL. Only four of Rangers’ opponents — the Shire, Clyde, Stirling Albion and Queen’s Park — are within short travelling distance.

As well as the Blue Toon, Elgin and Montrose mean long treks north, while not one of Stranraer, Annan and Berwick Rangers are within two hours of Ibrox in the other direction. It is going to be a season like no other.

Just try getting a ticket for that game at Balmoor next month, the day on which history will be made. Even the visit of the Shire might threaten the Ibrox capacity. People love a novelty, after all.

Rangers crisis: Ally McCoist points to a new beginning in Third Division

Send us down! Rangers boss McCoist points to a new beginning in Third Division

|

UPDATED:

23:52 GMT, 5 July 2012

Ally McCoist declared that
Rangers would be better rebuilding from
the Third Division if it means avoiding
further sanctions.

A day after SPL clubs delivered a resounding 'no'
vote to Charles Green's newco, Ibrox manager
McCoist hinted a fresh start in the bottom tier –
without more punishment – was his preferred
option.

Make the pain stop: McCoist wants to put an end to the misery

Make the pain stop: McCoist wants
to put an end to the misery

SFL clubs will vote at a specially convened EGM on Friday the 13th on whether to admit the newco directly into the First Division. And it's believed SFA plans are afoot to shoe-horn it into a quickly-formed SPL2 if the motion is rejected.

However, it is anticipated the price for being parachuted into the second tier would be a points penalty. Given that the newco will be effectively standing in the old club's shoes, a one-year transfer embargo – or an alternative – might also be imposed.

Currently with just 13 signed players – most with no first-team experience – McCoist insisted life in the First Division under those circumstances would be intolerable.

Echoing the majority of Rangers fans who believe re-starting two leagues down would be a more palatable outcome, McCoist told Rangers TV: 'The vast majority of SPL chairmen have been listening to their supporters, which is great, I'm all for it.

'We had a meeting with our supporters last night and the vast majority – in the region of 75 to 80 per cent – have said enough is enough, let's go to SFL3.

'Our good friends at Celtic across the city issued a statement that stated that integrity was of paramount importance to Scottish football and we totally agree with that, and I would imagine the vast majority of all SPL chairmen agree with that statement.

Crisis: The Ibrox club's future remains uncertain

Crisis: The Ibrox club's future remains uncertain

'It's the first time I have heard anyone
from the SFA speak about the game in a financial sense, but then we
have the argument of whether the financial aspect is more important than
the massive aspect of integrity and honesty of the Scottish game.

'They might want to put us in SFL1 with more sanctions – I don't know if that is the case.

'We have a transfer embargo hanging over us but how can I operate with a
transfer embargo when I only have six players It's impossible, just
madness.

'We need to bring in the region of 10, 12 or even 14 players. I reckon since January we have lost close to 21 players.

'We have to start rebuilding and replacing. For the record, in terms of
sanctions that have been imposed already, we were deducted 10 points, we
had our Champions League place taken away from us, we were fined
160,000, we are out of Europe for another three years and, of course,
we are out of the SPL. I think that's quite a lot.'

McCoist agreed with Green that Rangers will now accept whatever fate holds next week.

'We are now in the hands of David Longmuir at the SFL, who is certainly a man Charles and I trust implicitly,' he said.

'He is a good honest man that I firmly believe has the best interests of Scottish football at heart.'

Rangers

Rangers in crisis: Neil Lennon says treat Rangers like rest

Treat Rangers like rest, says Lennon as Ibrox club face new sanctions

|

UPDATED:

23:39 GMT, 29 April 2012

Neil Lennon has insisted that Rangers must be punished if they break the rules of the game — and not treated as a special case.

The Celtic manager, who believes that sporting integrity must override all other factors, was speaking after his side strolled to a 3-0 victory over the Ibrox men at Parkhead.

The SPL clubs will vote on rules that could allow a newco Rangers to continue to play in the top flight after being hit with a series of points and financial penalties.

Demand: Neil Lennon (centre) does not want Rangers treated differently

Demand: Neil Lennon (centre) does not want Rangers treated differently

But even if the proposals are voted through, the Ibrox club’s very existence is still threatened by a one-year transfer embargo, as well as SPL and SFA probes into alleged double contracts.

Rangers boss Ally McCoist has outlined his belief that provision has to be made as his club, together with Celtic, is a ‘special case’ in economic terms.

However, Lennon, while sympathetic with his counterpart’s view, insists the laws of the game must be applied, without exception, to all clubs. Asked if Rangers and Celtic should be treated differently, Lennon replied: ‘No. Not if you break the rules — not if you break the laws of football.

‘There’s an issue of sporting integrity. Moral sporting integrity as well.

‘I understand Ally’s point, to a certain extent, but if you have flouted the laws in the capacity that they have, then I’d imagine the powers that be will punish them accordingly.

‘It’s out of my hands. But if you break the rules, you should expect to be punished,’ he said.

‘I can’t comment on what has been going on at another club. The powers that be will deal with it as they see fit.

‘But I don’t want to see them (Old Firm games) go because it really whets the appetite. As a player, you’d miss them terribly — as a manager, they are horrible. Honestly. Even today when there’s no real pressure on the game.

Pure delight: Celtic celebrate as they beat Rangers in the Old Firm derby

Pure delight: Celtic celebrate as they beat Rangers in the Old Firm derby

‘You are always apprehensive going into it. The build-up is over a week in advance and we’ve got the fallout now.

‘I’ve got to say, I thought both sets of supporters were fantastic. There was a lot of humour going about and that’s what we want to see, not the other side — the nastiness. Both sets of supporters were a credit to their clubs.’

Lennon watched his championship-winning side emphatically extend their lead at the top to 21 points through goals from Charlie Mulgrew, Kris Commons and Gary Hooper.

With just three games remaining, the victory renders talk of tainted titles redundant in that Rangers could not now overcome their greatest rivals even had 10 points not been deducted for going into administration.

And while extolling the virtues of a win that saw the honours in this season’s Old Firm clashes end even, Lennon was happy to point a finger at the critics who have attempted to belittle his side’s achievement this term.

‘It’s not us who are saying these things,’ added the Celtic manager. ‘Some people have said that this title is devalued and tainted. The only way it is tainted is if you’ve cheated to win it.

‘We’ve done nothing wrong. We’ve played the best football, scored the most goals and conceded the fewest.

‘We’ve got the best disciplinary record in the league, so we’re worthy champions.

‘We haven’t started games well against Rangers this season, so it was imperative we got a foothold in the game early on.

Big win: Kris Commons scores Celtic's second goal against Rangers on Sunday

Big win: Kris Commons scores Celtic's second goal against Rangers on Sunday

‘We were disappointed with the way we started the last game at Ibrox, even though we came back into it at the end.

‘The set-piece (for Mulgrew’s opener) was something we looked at. We just felt there was an area we could exploit at the back post.

‘If you take all their best headers away from that area, Kris has got to execute the cross and Charlie’s got to put it away.

‘It gave us a great foothold in the game. The second goal is brilliant. It was a great weight of pass from Gary and Kris has drawn Kyle (Bartley) in and got away for a great finish. Those aren’t easy.

‘The third goal, we’ve picked their pocket and Gary’s thumped it into the net.

‘At 3-0, I’m thinking I don’t want Rangers to score and get back into the game. Everybody else is thinking four or five, but I can’t ask any more.

‘I thought my midfield of (Scott) Brown and (Joe) Ledley were fantastic and covered every blade of grass. They read the game well and broke it up.

‘I thought (Kris) Commons was exceptional today as well. They did everything we asked them to do and I’m so proud of them. It’s been a good day for the club and the supporters.

‘Everyone will say I got my tactics bang on and all that nonsense. We played well and were the better team. That’s why we’re worthy champions, but I don’t buy into all the tactical stuff that I got one over on Ally — we just won the game and I’m thrilled with that.

‘We’ve answered all the questions and shown we are worthy champions.’

World Snooker Championship 2012: Mark Allen could face ban

Allen faces possible ban after his outrageous claim that Chinese players 'cheat'

|

UPDATED:

16:37 GMT, 23 April 2012

Mark Allen has been warned he could be banned for his 'unacceptable' claim that Chinese snooker players lack integrity.

World Snooker chairman Barry Hearn said in a Crucible press conference that he would demand disciplinary chiefs treat Allen's remarks seriously.

Hearn stated his concern that outspoken players are putting their fellow professionals' careers at risk, with the danger that the sport as a whole could suffer.

Claim: Mark Allen accused his first round opponent of cheating

Claim: Mark Allen accused his first round opponent of cheating

'This is a very good time to be a snooker player,' Hearn said. 'It's not a good time to be an idiot.

'Everywhere we go, these players are ambassadors of snooker. They're chaperones of the image of the game.

'In major expanding markets, and
there's no doubt China is that, big time, they have to bear the
responsibility of those comments and the potential loss – not to
themselves or whether they don't get a visa, but the potential loss to
the game in general and the desire for the rest of the players to earn a
living playing their chosen sport.

'They have responsibility at every
level and it concerns me that sometimes it's a case that the mouth is
functioning but the brain has not been consulted.'

The World Professional Billiards and
Snooker Association have confirmed they will be writing to Allen to
initiate disciplinary proceedings. They have already fined Allen on four
occasions this season, costing the 26-year-old Northern Irishman over
2,500.

WPBSA chairman Jason Ferguson said:
'The WPBSA is responsible for the governance of snooker worldwide and
takes very seriously comments made which could be perceived to be
directed at a particular nation. The chairman of the disciplinary
committee Nigel Mawer is making further inquiries into this incident.
Mark Allen will be given 14 days to respond to the letter.'

Surprise: China's Cao Yupeng shocked Allen to progress to the second round

Surprise: China's Cao Yupeng shocked Allen to progress to the second round

Allen spoke out after suffering a
surprise Crucible defeat to world No 81 Cao Yupeng on Sunday, when
he believed his opponent should have called a foul against himself
midway through the match. The Antrim potter said he was 'disgusted' that
Cao had not owned up to an offence, however television replays were
inconclusive.

Allen also said: 'It seems to be a
bit of a trait for the Chinese players because there have been instances
in the past, of fouls and blatant cheating going on.'

Allen is not the only player to have
riled Hearn, with Mark Williams' foul-mouthed Twitter criticism of the
Crucible venue on Friday bewildering him.

Hearn said: 'Mark Allen's comments at
the press conference yesterday, and Mark Williams' comments on his
Twitter (account), are unacceptable to World Snooker.

'If these comments look likely to
bring the game of snooker into disrepute, then the very sternest
disciplinary action will be taken against both players.

'It is time for players to
understand. Prize money has more than doubled in two years. It comes at a
price; it's called professionalism.

Barry Hearn

Barry Hearn

'Any player that decides to ignore
the players' contract, that he signs to take advantage of these new
benefits in snooker, means they are risking their position on the main
tour. This is zero tolerance.

'We have the powers to do anything providing we've acted reasonably. It's a fine, a potential suspension, or a ban.'

Discussing two-time world champion Williams, Hearn said the Welshman's remarks were 'absolutely lunacy'.

Allen has already caused offence in
China this season, branding the island of Hainan, which staged the World
Open, as “horrendous” and its people as 'ignorant'.

He was fined 1,000 for those comments, but Hearn said on Monday: 'I don't think it's a strong enough disincentive by any means.

'That's why our recommendation is
that if he's found guilty this time I would expect the WPBSA to take a
more serious approach at the level of fines. How far do we go until the
players understand their responsibility to the game

'There comes a point when you have to
say enough is enough. And I'm trusting the WPBSA disciplinary system to
take that into account. If they don't take it into account, we've got to
look at our own rules again. It will be taken into account.'