Rangers in crisis: Bill Miller favourite after Bill Ng withdraws

Fresh twist in Rangers saga as Miller becomes favourite after Ng withdraws

|

UPDATED:

14:07 GMT, 20 April 2012

Showing his hand: Bill Miller

Showing his hand: Bill Miller

Bill Miller has unveiled plans for an 11.2million bid for Rangers which would create what he described as an 'incubator' company, on the day Bill Ng withdrew from the bidding process.

In a statement, US-based Miller revealed he would suspend his offer until Monday to allow other bidders to 'put up or shut up'.

Ng meanwhile, said he has become 'increasingly uncomfortable and frustrated with the process of dealing with club administrators'.

After deciding a straight CVA would be too risky and prolonged, Miller claims he has found a new solution.

The American businessman said: 'In order to preserve the club's history, records, championships and assets, I will put the heart of the club into an 'incubator' company while Duff and Phelps works to make the sick patient healthy through a CVA process that effectively works to radiate the toxicity of past administrations' sins out of the patient while the healthy heart is preserved and moves forward.'

Miller revealed he was setting the record straight after seeing 'inaccuracies' about his bid reported or intimated by others.

He said: 'Most importantly, I am doing this now so that Rangers fans and supporters can judge my bid and plans for the club on their actual merits – rather than rumours and innuendo.'

He said: 'Despite constant rumours and suggestions by others, I have proposed a purchase of the club through a CVA from the beginning. I have no plans for liquidation of the club.'

But he added: 'All of the groundswell created in the attempt to indicate that a CVA is a simple solution to save the club and its history is simply a naive understanding of how this CVA process would work and the risks associated.'

Miller revealed he had refused to speak to Craig Whyte or Ticketus, who gave the club 30.5million in funds during the majority shareholder's tenure in return for future season ticket sales.

'It is difficult for me to see how any parties who were present when this awful situation was created can be a legitimate part of the solution,' said Miller, who owns a Tennessee-based towing and vehicle recovery firm.

Out of the running: Bill Ng has withdrawn his offer to buy Rangers

Out of the running: Bill Ng has withdrawn his offer to buy Rangers

He believes Ticketus, who are owed 26.7million, would block any CVA, resulting in lengthy legal proceedings.

'This would place additional penalties on Rangers as long as they remain in administration,' he said.

'Obviously, the longer the process dragged on without a resolution, the less viable the club would become. If this process continued on for a long period without resolution, the inevitable result would be real liquidation.'

Miller then explained his 'incubation' approach that he claims will save Rangers, protect its history and give it a fresh start.

He added: 'Once the CVA process has been completed and the patient is on the mend, the administrators will return Rangers Football Club plc to me for a nominal sum.

'The healthy heart and the healthy patient (The Rangers Football Club plc) will then be reunited through merger.'

Ng earlier expressed frustration with Duff and Phelps as he withdrew, although he said he could relaunch his bid if no other deal was struck.

A statement said: 'Recent developments
in the bidding process, with unwarranted and unexplained delays, have
prompted our withdrawal from the bidding process.

'After lengthy negotiations with a
number of key stakeholders, we have serious concerns over the
deliverability of the shares on offer to gain control of the club.'

The chairman of Singapore top-flight
club Hougang United had previously expressed frustration with Ticketus,
who he claimed increased their demands from 10million to 17.5million
but he expressed most disappointment with Duff and Phelps, accusing them
of “moving the goalposts”.

As well as the Ticketus liability and
SPL proposals, areas of uncertainty around Rangers include the rights of
majority shareholder Craig Whyte, an outcome on the tribunal over their
potential 75million tax bill.

Delay: The administrators have been criticised for taking too long

Delay: The administrators have been criticised for taking too long

Ng said there was 'no guarantee' his group would acquire Whyte`s 85 per cent shareholding if they agreed a price.

The Blue Knights` position is unclear with former Rangers director Paul Murray, who is spearheading their campaign, saying they were reconsidering their position on Wednesday after stepping back from the process on Monday to allow Ng to complete a deal.

The administrators told Kennedy they could not accept his revised verbal offer, which he claimed to have doubled to a 'double digit million pound bid'.

McCoist expressed hope of a quick resolution.

e said: “It's only my opinion but I don't think we can wait until anything like the end of May,” said McCoist, who has spoken to Miller at length twice but never talked to Ng.

'It's not up to me to have a preferred bidder. I have to remain completely and utterly open-minded about it.

'The only thing that I wish for is somebody who has the club's best interests at heart to take it over.

'I would have no problem with anybody that I've spoken to taking it over because I do believe they have the club's best interests at heart.

'My main concern is that we get a positive result. That's all that matters.'

BILL MILLER'S STATEMENT IN FULL

I am making my proposal to takeover Rangers Football Club open, transparent and available to all those interested in Rangers future.

Given all of the noise in the media from various sides of the transaction and given the numerous inaccuracies in much of what has been reported or intimated by others, I have decided the time has come to set the record straight and to issue a challenge to any would-be suitors of the club.

Most importantly, I am doing this now so that Rangers fans and supporters can judge my bid and plans for the club on their actual merits – rather than rumours and innuendo.

There is no time left for empty promises and grand-standing.

The time has come for all interested parties to either put up or shut up.

Everyone involved has had their '15 minutes of fame'.

Let's save Rangers. There is no time left.

Facts about my bid:

Of the three qualified bidders, I am the only bidder who refused to entertain offers from Ticketus or engage in discussions with Craig Whyte.

It is difficult for me to see how any parties who were present when this awful situation was created can be a legitimate part of the solution.

I believe firmly that when you mortgage the future by the use of debts and financing instruments like has been done in the recent past, you endanger the very survival of the club.

All of the ground swell created in the attempt to indicate that a CVA is a simple solution to save the club and its history is simply a naove understanding of how this CVA process would work and the risks associated.”

Despite constant rumours and suggestions by others, I have proposed a purchase of the club through a CVA from the beginning.

I have no plans for liquidation of the club. After careful evaluation of a Rangers CVA process, it has become apparent that there are substantial roadblocks and risks associated with such an approach.

Of the qualified creditor claims, which is currently under 100M, the Ticketus claim of 27M (in excess of 25% of the total) would put Ticketus in a position to be able to block any CVA agreement with which they did not agree.

There is no way that Ticketus would agree to accept a “pence on the pound” settlement as has been suggested by others.

In addition, it is apparent that there will be several lawsuits that will emerge in relation to a potential CVA exit among the various creditors and claimants (you pick them), which will need to be settled by the courts.

Consequently, the CVA will be prolonged – meaning the process would go on well into next season and possibly beyond. This would place additional penalties on Rangers as long as they remain in administration.

Obviously, the longer the process dragged on without a resolution, the less viable the club would become. If this process continued on for a long period without resolution, the inevitable result would be real liquidation.”

Over several weeks of discussions, my advisory team and I have created a solution that saves Rangers, protects its history and gives it a fresh start – rescued from the ruin created by others.

I believe, and we have compelling professional advice to support my view, that my offer, as structured, can enable this to happen without any question of Rangers seeking or being given any special treatment.”

My proposal on the table now is to pay 11.2M for the club which includes the 500,000 deposit required by Duff & Phelps.

In order to preserve the club's history, records, championships and assets, I will put the “heart” of the club into an “incubator” company while Duff & Phelps works to make the “sick patient” healthy through a CVA process that effectively works to “radiate” the toxicity of past administrations' sins out of the patient while the “healthy heart” is preserved and moves forward. Once the CVA process has been completed and the patient is on the mend, the administrators will return Rangers Football Club plc to me for a nominal sum.

The healthy heart and the healthy patient (The Rangers Football Club plc) will then be reunited through merger.

In this scenario, the club can continue with all of its business assets, including its history, protected from the present illness.

Thus a new corporate entity will own the club's assets during the incubation period including all of its history.

Any suggestion that Rangers history is lost by such a process is preposterous.

Using such logic, Rangers would not actually have a 140-year history as its current corporate structure was only created in 1899. To suggest that Rangers thus have only a 113-year-old history is absurd.”

As a final step in the process, I have held a series of talks over the past week with officials from the SPL and SFA in an effort to ensure Rangers play in the 2012/13 season without further points deductions, fines or other punitive sanctions, relating to either the terms of my purchase or the actions of the prior administrations, beyond those levied during the 2011/12 season.

My offer is contingent upon the regulatory bodies agreeing that the club will begin play in the 2012/13 season in the SPL and that they will do so without any loss of points and with all historic titles intact.

I will not acquire the club unless I receive written assurances from both regulatory bodies to this effect.

It is my strong view that Rangers and their fans should not continue to be punished in the future for the past failures of others.

Rangers need a fresh start and I will always stand up for the club.

The plan:

I have retained the services of certain sports business and UK football experts from Scotland, England and America to assist with the turnaround of this distressed and loss-making business.

I realize Rangers have been losing money on a monthly basis and can easily find itself right back in administration in short order if significant changes are not made to the business and if the new owner does not have the financial wherewithal to accomplish the turnaround while the club haemorrhages cash.

We will focus on a disciplined business approach that uses strict adherence to budgets and metrics to ensure the club does not attempt to live beyond its means so that it can be in compliance with UEFA's new requirements of financial fair play.

I am acutely aware that the club will require working capital and this will be assessed in more detail in coming weeks as the due diligence period progresses.

We will focus Rangers aggressively on growing current revenue streams and developing new ones. I believe that such a program is necessary to ensure Rangers have the kind of player wage bill that is necessary to field a highly competitive team, while not operating at a loss.

As I have already discussed directly with him, Ally McCoist will be retained as the First Team Manager and will be responsible for the success of Rangers on the pitch.

The challenge to others:

Since other bidders and/or would-be bidders have consistently made claims in the press for weeks and months about how they have all the solutions and answers for saving Rangers, I have decided to offer a challenge.

I have worked quietly over the past several weeks to put together a plan that saves Rangers from liquidation and allows the club to be made healthy again.

I have attempted to do this without fanfare or without drawing personal attention to myself as I don't need or desire to see my name in the headlines.

However, it appears there are others who suggest that I have some motive other than to acquire and protect the history of this great club and put in on a strong footing for the future. They maintain they have better plans to save Rangers.

So, in an effort to give Rangers and its fans, supporters, players and staff an opportunity to see for themselves, I have shared the details of my plans.

Although it was my intention to wire the required deposit tomorrow to secure preferred bidder status, I have notified Duff & Phelps that my offer is to be suspended until Monday to give anyone else interested in acquiring Rangers time to complete their bid and put down the 500,000 deposit.

I would not want anyone to have the impression that my offer is not the best one for the club.

So I now put it to the other suitors who claim to want what is best for Rangers. If you sincerely want to save Rangers, the time has come for you to put up or shut up.

I will agree to “stand down” until Monday, April 23rd to allow any and all “saviours” to step up and claim the club by paying the required deposit and entering into an agreement to purchase.

The time for talk is over. The club is in serious jeopardy of dying. “Real” liquidation is looming.

If no one else steps up by Monday, then I will assume everyone is done talking and I am the only one serious about saving Rangers.

In the meantime, I will continue talks with the SPL/SFA in an effort to get a quick and satisfactory resolution so I can then move forward to become the preferred bidder as outlined.

I ask Rangers fans, supporters, staff, players and Ally McCoist, after reviewing my plan for the club, to make their opinions known by Monday to the press and to the SFA and SPL officials. Time is running out to save Rangers.

Michel Platini"s Champions League masterplan is flawed – Martin Samuel

Platini is to blame! Why his Champions League masterplan is still flawed

Dinamo Zagreb are outraged, but it is easy to see why speculation, rumour and innuendo continue to swirl around their 7-1 home defeat by Lyon on Wednesday night.

In constructing a competition with an increasing number of mismatches and hopeless cases, UEFA have created the perfect conditions in which corruption could occur.

Winking: Domagoj Vida gestures towards Bafetimbi Gomis

One in the eye Dinamo Zagreb”s Domagoj Vida appears to wink after one of Lyon”s goals

One team from a weaker, poorer league with nothing to play for; another with wealth and strength and a financial prize measured in tens of millions at stake.

Those looking with suspicion at the fact a three-point, seven-goal swing occurred in the final round of matches in Champions League Group D may be cynical but also calling on experience.

There is a reason why nags are more likely to be nobbled than thoroughbreds, why whispers of corruption are heard at satellite tennis tournaments but not the men”s final at Wimbledon.

No laughing matter: Keeper Ivan Kelava is beaten for one of Lyon

No laughing matter: Keeper Ivan Kelava is beaten for one of Lyon”s goals but still smiles at the end

Dinamo Zagreb

The greater the contest, the greater the reward, the less opportunity there is for debasement. It makes sense that Real Madrid and Barcelona would give their all on Saturday with so much at stake; but what if one side had nothing left to lose and was overwhelmingly inferior financially. These are the circumstances sport must guard against; yet also circumstances increasingly present in the Champions League.

Fallen short: Platini

Fallen short: Platini”s reforms have failed to impress

Dinamo Zagreb”s record going into the match with Lyon was played five, lost five, goal difference minus 13. In recent years such an abysmal performance is unexceptional.

Starting with the 2009-10 campaign, UEFA president Michel Platini came up with another well-intentioned but deeply flawed reform – he really has cornered the market of late – by promoting more title-winning clubs from smaller countries into the group stage.

Without revisiting seeding or wealth distribution, however, it was a feeble idea – establishing a raft of over-promoted inferiors unable to hold their own against the secure elite.

Dinamo Zagreb were among those taking the champions qualifying route to this season”s tournament – and the fifth in three seasons not to record a single point.

Four-star: Lyon

Four-star: Lyon”s Bafetimbi Gomis (right) netted four against Dinamo Zagreb

There have been seven teams in that brief time to lose all six games, compared with eight in the 17 Champions League campaigns prior to Platini”s brainwave.

The majority of the recent duds, five of seven, have been his falsely encouraged champions. This creates an unhealthy number of matches in which one team have nothing to play for.

As these clubs are usually from smaller nations, whose rewards from European football are much reduced, it is precisely this climate that should be avoided.

Damming stat: Otelul Galati have failed to register a single point

Damming stat: Otelul Galati have failed to register a single point

Here are the figures. Since 2009-10 15 clubs have entered by Platini”s champions route via qualifying rounds. They have played 90 Champions League group games and lost 59 of them, winning just 13. Their combined goal difference is minus 118.

The Worst Champions League teams

In that time, 10 of the 15 have finished bottom of their group, just three have qualified and only one have come top (APOEL Nicosia of Cyprus, although with nine points and a level goal difference in Group G this season, they would have been knocked out in five of the other seven Champions League groups).

The most damning statistic, however, is the number of whitewashes that have occurred in that time. Maccabi Haifa and Debrecen (2009-10), MSK Zilina and Partizan Belgrade (2010-11) and Dinamo Zagreb, Villarreal and Otelul Galati (2011-12) have all failed to register a single point. Only Villarreal and Galati did not progress by virtue of Platini”s grand plan.

In the year before the new qualification rules were introduced, no Champions League team lost every game. There is no doubt the gulf is widening. In this season”s competition, four clubs conceded an average of two or more goals a game. This is meant to be the cream of Europe.

Faced with opponents that are fourth in England (Chelsea), sixth in Germany (Bayer Leverkusen) and third in Spain (Valencia), no team in the world”s strongest club competition should end up trailing by 14 goals over six matches, as Genk of Belgium did.

The worst Champions League group stage record is six losses with a minus 19 goal difference, a fate suffered by four clubs, three of them Platini”s qualifying champions (Debrecen, Zilina and Dinamo Zagreb).

“I have no doubts whatsoever about the integrity of the match or the competition,” said Platini of Lyon”s 7-1 win. And it is true that UEFA”s gambling fraud detection system, which is designed to spot suspicious gambling patterns that could point to match-fixing, has not detected anything awry.

Yet questions should still be asked and not simply because the performance of Dinamo Zagreb was so abject and certain individual displays so inept that it would be almost a dereliction of duty not to apply further scrutiny.

The qualification process must be addressed because it is only a matter of time before an unscrupulous individual seeks to exploit the divide between the haves and have-nots.

Even if it means taking on the traditional elite of the European game, Platini must find a way of bringing the competitors closer together – and his financial fair play rules will only widen the existing gap as the richest are given proportionately more to spend – before it is too late.

The rumour mill may have done Zagreb a disservice this time. Perhaps they merely are among the most spineless, useless, weak-willed wretches ever to have fluked their way into a major European competition. Hardly a comforting thought though, is it

The Champions League is not full of cheats, merely incompetents. And all the signs are their numbers are growing.