Arsene Wenger: Santi Cazorla has everyone"s respect

Respect! Cavalier Cazorla has done his talking on the pitch, says Wenger

|

UPDATED:

13:12 GMT, 14 September 2012

Arsene Wenger feels Santi Cazorla's cavalier style helped him settle right into the heart of the Arsenal side.

The Spain midfielder has caught the eye with impressive displays in the first three Barclays Premier League games following his 15million summer move from Malaga.

Cazorla netted his first Arsenal goal in the 2-0 win at Liverpool as the Gunners headed into the international break unbeaten and on the back of three clean sheets.

Settling in: Arsene Wenger has been delighted with the impact of Santi Cazorla

Settling in: Arsene Wenger has been delighted with the impact of Santi Cazorla

The 27-year-old is again expected to be at the centre of the action when newly-promoted Southampton come to the Emirates Stadium on Saturday looking for their first points on their return to the top flight.

'Cazorla has gained the respect of everybody very quickly. Cazorla is humble, he loves the game and that is what you want from every football player,' Wenger said. 'They talk on the pitch, don't need to speak too much, just go on the pitch and show what you can do. That is what he does.

'He loves the game, loves to play with his partners and that is the best way to gain respect from everybody.'

German striker Lukas Podolski, signed from Cologne, also found the net at Anfield, producing a dynamic display on the left side of the attack.

While fellow summer recruit Olivier Giroud, top scorer in Ligue 1 for champions Montpellier last season, has yet to break his Gunners duck, Wenger has been impressed by how the trio have settled into the hustle and bustle of the English domestic game.

'They are used to European football much more than the Premier League. The Premier League is a bit more special thanks to the rhythm of the games, the pace, the intensity of the commitment, intensity of every challenge,' he said.

'Sometimes [it is difficult] to adapt to that, but the way we play is a very continental style, so it gives them a good chance to adapt very quickly.

Goal time: Cazorla wrapped up Arsenal's win over Liverpool in style

Goal time: Cazorla wrapped up Arsenal's win over Liverpool in style

'Players like Cazorla have adapted in a speedy way, the game goes through them.

'Sometimes it is easy in the middle of the park, sometimes it is easy in the centre of the pitch to adapt because the game goes more through you.'

Southampton head to north London propping up the Premier League and without a point from three matches. Those statistics, though, do not tell the whole story for Nigel Adkins' men.

Having given champions Manchester City a fright on the opening weekend – when they had led at the Etihad Stadium with 20 minutes left – the Saints then came within moments of earning a draw against Manchester United before Robin van Persie, a 24million signing from the Gunners, completed his hat-trick in stoppage-time to seal a 3-2 win.

Wenger feels those disappointments of not being rewarded for their industry and positive play could change Southampton's mindset.

Close run thing: Southampton have pushed both Manchester clubs all the way

Close run thing: Southampton have pushed both Manchester clubs all the way

'Three games without a win affects the way you approach the game,' he said. 'They know they have potential. They will of course try to transform that potential into points, but maybe their approach will be a bit more cautious.'

Wenger has been impressed with Adkins' achievements, the former Scunthorpe physio having overseen successive promotions up from npower League One.

'He had a very peculiar [route] to get the job, but he has done well,' Wenger said on Arsenal Player. 'I had the chance to see him when we played down at Southampton in pre-season.

'He is a very interesting man who wants to get information, and did that in a very convincing way. I am impressed with how well he has done and the way he has done it.'

Theo Walcott is a doubt to face his former club because of a virus which saw him miss England's World Cup qualifier against Ukraine at Wembley.

Cesc Fabregas tells Robin van Persie to stay at Arsenal

Cesc tells RVP to stay at Arsenal… one year after leaving them for Barcelona

|

UPDATED:

08:16 GMT, 23 May 2012

Former Arsenal captain Cesc Fabregas has urged Robin van Persie not to follow him out of the door of The Emirates and stay in north London.

Fabregas quit Arsenal last summer for a move to boyhood team Barcelona but has urged his former team-mate to stay put and help them win trophies.

Gunners fans may be slightly bemused by the comments from Fabregas as the midfielder was involved in several summer-long transfer sagas but the midfielder says he remains an Arsenal fan.

Will he stay or will he go Robin van Persie must decide on his future this summer

Will he stay or will he go Robin van Persie must decide on his future this summer

He told a Catalan newspaper: 'As an Arsenal fan I would be happy if he stayed in London to help Arsenal win titles.'

Arsenal are facing another transfer saga in their battle to keep van Persie as Manchester City, Manchester United and Juventus are in for him while Real Madrid and Barcelona are watching developments.

Arsenal have offered van Persie a deal worth 130,000-a-week plus a 5m signing-on fee and may hold him to the final year of his contract.

Don't do what I did: Cesc Fabregas has told Robin Van Persie to stay at Arsenal

Don't do what I did: Cesc Fabregas has told Robin Van Persie to stay at Arsenal

Ex-Arsenal captain Fabregas also insisted that Gareth Bale – who is on Barca’s wish list – should be seen as a winger rather than an attacking full back even for Barcelona’s cavalier attitude.

Fabregas added: 'People talks about him as a lateral defender (full back) but I think he is more of a winger than a lateral player.'

Patrick Collins: Formula One should pull out of Bahrain

Formula One should forget the money and pull out of Bahrain

|

UPDATED:

21:17 GMT, 14 April 2012

It was an agonising decision and the people in charge of Formula One gave the matter scrupulous thought; you might even say that they tortured themselves.

On the one hand there were infernal questions of ethics, decency and principle. On the other, there were shedloads of easy money.

Finally, they announced their decision: game, set and match to filthy lucre.

Supremo: Bernie Ecclestone is the most powerful figure in British motor racing

Supremo: Bernie Ecclestone is the most powerful figure in British motor racing

The Bahrain Grand Prix goes ahead next Sunday. Now, I have never been to Bahrain and, were I ever to go, I should make quite certain that my visit did not coincide with the Grand Prix, a noxious, raucous, polluting affront to the environment, masquerading as a sport.

Last year it was cancelled, following a wave of pro-democracy demonstrations which resulted in injuries and deaths. The months that followed brought still worse disturbances, most notably the arrests of 20 doctors who treated wounded demonstrators and were jailed for up to 15 years for their compassionate response.

With its cavalier attitude towards democratic standards and human rights, along with allegations of torture of prisoners, its callous ill-treatment of a hunger striker and its flagrant disregard for conventional, civilised values, Bahrain seemed a place best avoided.

But then, there is that matter of money. The place is awash with petrodollars, and motor racing has claimed its share. There are commercial agreements in place, huge sums are at stake, the kingdom has invested untold millions in advertising themselves through those screaming machines. Compensation could be crippling. And yet the danger of disruption was real and informed reports suggested that various teams were wavering.

Having his say: Sir Jackie Stewart wants the race to be staged in Bahrain

Having his say: Sir Jackie Stewart wants the race to be staged in Bahrain

Whereupon three distinctive voices were raised in favour of continuing with the race, no matter what those tiresome civil rights people might think.

Sir Jackie Stewart, that renowned champion of the underdog, asked: 'What about the sponsors Whether it's Mobil or Total or Shell, they're going to be seen by hundreds of millions of people… do you think it's correct not to get the exposure they have bought as a supplier'

And, while we were still chuckling at that cringing little effort, up piped John Yates. Yes, Yates of the Yard. He is currently employed by the Bahrain government to advise on police reform – no, really – and he announced that the whole affair was invented by the social media.

He conceded that the 'almost nightly skirmishes that take place in certain villages are a potential block on progress' but that, apparently, didn't signify too much. Why, he insisted that he felt safer in Bahrain than he did in London, the city for whose safety he was so recently responsible. You could not even begin to make it up.

Finally, Bernie Ecclestone, the commercial rights holder who stands to collect a race fee of some 25million, sent a wondrously unsubtle message to the teams. 'We can't say, “You've got to go'',' he said. 'Although they would be in breach of their agreement with us if they didn't go.'

Yates: Now employed by the Bahrain government

Yates: Now employed by the Bahrain government

These are powerful witnesses, so we should remind ourselves of their credentials. Stewart is a former world champion, a royal court jester and a bosom chum of the great “Sir” Fred Goodwin of RBS, the bank from which our Jackie reportedly trousered several million pounds as a 'global ambassador'.

Dear old Yates is blessed with both a sense of the ridiculous and a neck of pure brass. If I wanted an informed appraisal of London's finest restaurants, or was anxious to secure my daughter a post with the Met Police, then he might be my first port of call. Sadly, this is the fellow who, just last week, was accused of 'poor judgment' by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.

As for Ecclestone, what can we say of that all-round good egg He is the jovial billionaire who described the action of the Spanish motor racing fans in blacking their faces to taunt Lewis Hamilton as 'a bit of a joke'. He is also the man who once remarked that Adolf Hitler was 'able to get things done'.

Now, the fact that this ghastly triumvirate is solidly behind the staging of the race does not necessarily mean that it should not go ahead as planned.

But I do suggest that when Stewart, Ecclestone and Yates of the Yard speak with a single voice, then the wisest place to be is on the other side of the argument. And when protesting passions run as high as they are running in Bahrain, then simple prudence would seem the wiser course.

Last year, cancellation was accepted as an appropriate reaction to the threat of disruption. With due regard to the tragic victims – Mobil and Total, Shell and Bernie – I suggest that the same course should be followed this week.

Filthy lucre should not always enjoy the last word. And the world would be no poorer for the loss of the Bahrain Grand Prix.

England could do worse than try again with Hoddle

Once upon a time, you could see the future. Tottenham were the team that everybody outside Manchester wanted to be.

Bright, inventive, even ‘swashbuckling’ in the eyes of their more romantic followers, they were
destined for something wonderful.

Probably not the title but quite certainly Europe; with the chance of a cavalier thrust at the FA Cup.

After which, they would hand over their manager to serve the national cause; the minklined,
platinum-plated conscription of Harry Redknapp.

Now here’s a funny thing: it hasn’t worked out like that.

Disappointing results: Harry Redknapp isn't quite such an overwhelming favourite to be the next England boss now

Disappointing results: Harry Redknapp isn't quite such an overwhelming favourite to be the next England boss now

Spurs have won just one of their last eight League games, the free-flowing torrent is reduced to a
trickle, Gareth Bale is no longer a genius and Harry has feet of clay.

The
lunatic fringe of the twitterati is booming that he was always
overrated and that Spurs should think seriously about keeping him, while
England should celebrate their narrow escape.

We
are witnessing the politics of the last result or, in Redknapp’s case,
the last eight results. Cursed with the attention span of lethargic
goldfish, his faithless friends have started to cast their net more
speculatively.

In a curious fashion, I believe they should have done this from the start. Redknapp has an elevated
idea
of the way the game should be played, he conjures outstanding
performances from unlikely players, he is one of those managers you want
to see succeed and his credit marks should not be
reduced by trite reappraisal. But he is not the designated answer to England’s prayers.

Could they go back Glenn Hoddle at a training session before the 1998 World Cup

Could they go back Glenn Hoddle at a training session before the 1998 World Cup

Before Redknapp’s coronation, the FA would be well-advised to ponder the claim of, say, Roy Hodgson. And, since the panel is composed of intelligent adults, they may well want to consider the virtues of a number of foreign candidates. This may enrage the Little Englander tendency but that is a price we should gladly pay.

Another possibility is more interesting. Glenn Hoddle produced the most impressive England side
since Sir Bobby Robson. A thoughtful, accomplished coach, he ultimately foundered on some
stridently quirky beliefs and practices, which disrupted his handling of the national team. If he has shed those distractions, then he could offer something important to the English cause.

Otherwise, Redknapp is the favourite and properly so. And he must remain favourite, even if Spurs
should succumb to an ordinary Chelsea team at Wembley on Sunday.

For his side are the product of a sharp and lively mind. England have acute need of such an asset.

PS…

The connections of Mario Balotelli would like it known that their man is sadly misunderstood. High-spirited, of course, prone to the odd laddish prank. In short, mercurial. Well, a week ago, the mercurial Mr Balotelli thrust a full set of studs into the shin of a fine professional named Alex Song.

/04/14/article-2129856-12848380000005DC-981_634x461.jpg” width=”634″ height=”461″ alt=”Seeing red: Mario Balotelli was sent off against Arsenal” class=”blkBorder” />

Seeing red: Mario Balotelli was sent off against Arsenal

Phil Mickelson is lovable but for the same reasons fallible – Martin Samuel

Cavalier 'Lefty' shows Tiger the way…

|

UPDATED:

01:13 GMT, 9 April 2012

Phil Mickelson stood, hands on hips, at the back of the fourth green. Way back on the fourth green. He had found his ball. The amount of jungle he was in, he might have flushed out some old Viet Cong, too.

And then that cavalier instinct took over. Common sense would have taken him back to the tee, citing an unplayable lie. On the green in three, sink the putt maybe, surrender a single shot, stay in the game. Mickelson had a better idea. He opted to play ball. Right-handed. His nickname is Lefty. There’s what’s wrong with that one.

Not quite: Phil Mickelson reacts to finishing his final round at the Masters

Not quite: Phil Mickelson reacts to finishing his final round at the Masters

His first hack moved the ball about an inch; his second came off the heel of the club, shooting it at an ugly angle 20 feet left. He then played one of his famous flops, which flopped famously into a bunker, from where he got up and down. In six. On a par three. That is four more shots than Louis Oosthuizen needed to sink his ball on the second hole. The second hole is a par five.

More from Martin Samuel…

Martin Samuel: Beckham for the Olympics Now that's a bum deal
08/04/12

Martin Samuel: Westwood still looking for closure after poor second round
06/04/12

Martin Samuel: America wants its old hero, not 'Nice Guy' Tiger
06/04/12

Freedom on a cushion We’ve been stitched up
06/04/12

Martin Samuel: Augusta in the shadow of gender war
04/04/12

Martin Samuel: Why time is running out for Liverpool and Dalglish
03/04/12

Martin Samuel: If only Torres scored when it mattered
01/04/12

The making and breaking of an accidental hero
29/03/12

VIEW FULL ARCHIVE

Oosthuizen landed an albatross, although Mickelson may well have killed one with that tee shot that sent him tumbling through the leaderboard, like a ton weight through weak flooring, never to recover. America’s sweetheart he may be, but there was something horribly familiar about the reason Mickelson did not win the 2012 Masters.

Everything that makes Mickelson lovable, also makes him fallible. In the same position, on the same hole, in the same competition next year, he probably wouldn’t change a thing. Arnold Palmer, his hero, had similar instincts.

‘Like that, buddy, all day long,’ said the man in the blue tailored shorts, as Mickelson’s first ball of the day nestled in the heart of the fairway. ‘Me and you, all day long.’

Quite how Blue Shorts was planning to contribute to the afternoon was unclear but like the rest of the nation he was going to root, root, root for the home team: and yesterday that meant giving it up for Lefty. The reaction is not always discerning. ‘Shot, Phil,’ said a voice at the back of the fourth, approvingly, as Mickelson’s ball headed towards the bamboo.

What makes Mickelson so adorable to America The little things. Watch him enter at the back of the first tee, head up, smiling broadly, engaged, open. Bubba Watson came through just moments before. He’s got the name, and the game, but Bubba’s head was lowered and his white sun-visor brim masked his eyes.

Lefty: But which hand's the club in

Lefty: But which hand's the club in

He gets jitters on the last day, he says, even if his game did not show it. Mickelson, by contrast, bounced around Augusta, positively bowled in Watson’s wake, big loping gait, engaging, optimistic. Didn’t always work, but it’s the attitude they love.

Last Thursday, at the break of dawn, Mickelson got out of his bed and put on his Augusta National green jacket formalwear – he has won three and many were sure he would make it four – to stand at the back of the first tee and watch the heroes of championship golf, Palmer, Jack Nicklaus and Gary Player, hit the ceremonial shots that signalled the beginning of the competition.

It was not simply a convenient pop-in. Mickelson was not due on the tee himself for another six hours. Nor were legions of cam-eramen alerted to this sentimental pilgrimage. His arrival came as a surprise to all.

There is no great calculation to Mickelson, say those that have followed his career longest. He did it because he is decent man, who loves golf, loves this tournament, loves what that generation did for the game, and wanted to see a moment in history, first hand. One day, young men in green jackets may wait to see his ceremonial drive.

Lovable: We root for Mickelson because of his bravery

Lovable: We root for Mickelson because of his bravery

Mickelson does not have to work hard to be this guy. He is not Tiger. He bumps fists and engages with the gallery. His good humour is effortless, his enthusiasm genuine.

Augusta loses its decorum a little when he is around, breaking out in loud whistles and Indian war whoops. On Saturday evening when Mickelson’s ball flew perfectly into the 18th green from a position in the light rough beneath some trees on the right, it was almost sucked down the hole by a gasp of pure love. If Woods with his game face on represents America as the world sees it, Mickelson is America as it wishes to be seen.

Mickelson is can-do, Mickelson is brave. If he fails, it is often because he is over-ambitious, too cavalier in game that frequently rewards conservatism, pragmatism or good old common sense. His hero is Palmer, cut from the same cloth.

It is the reason each promise to stop taking chances, to erase fickle consequence, ends hollow. Mickelson, like Palmer, cannot help the grand gesture, the attempt at the spectacular.

Not the same: Tiger Woods and Mickelson are very different creatures

Not the same: Tiger Woods and Mickelson are very different creatures

He is not incapable of playing safe or sensibly, but he often seems to be fighting the cautious urge with every fibre of his being, making eye contact left and right, almost as if he is searching for a reason to prick the bubble that surrounds champion golfers. To reach out to strangers and say, ‘Hey, guys, have a look at this.’

Palmer, was the same. Nicklaus was the winning machine, Palmer the people’s champion, exhilarating yet flawed. He tells a story of coming up the 18th at a big one, needing a par to win and a bogey to force a play-off.

Walking along the fairway he sees some faces he knows in the crowd. Just about every other professional would wave acknowledgement, at most, and march on; Palmer stops to talk. He returns to his ball, concentration disrupted, and double bogeys. The play-off went ahead without him.

Interactive: Mickelson talks to 'patrons' while other golfers may not

Interactive: Mickelson talks to 'patrons' while other golfers may not

Mickelson might not be quite as folksy as that – the nature of modern celebrity and the size of modern galleries lead to a less personal form of engagement – but the worthlessness of his autograph tells its own story. Like Palmer’s, it is simply too commonplace to be of value.

Walking around Augusta, half of the patrons here could claim to have interacted with Mickelson. He worked the crowd like a presidential candidate at a primary, pressing flesh, smiling giddily: except even the coldest cynic recognised that this was no act.

If a poor round from Woods has a profanity count up there with a late-night HBO special, Mickelson’s mouth is as clean as an Augusta cabin. ‘Oh no,’ was his only reaction to the shot that ended his chances here. ‘Oh yes,’ he then added, standing awkwardly over his ball moments later. And right there, his hope of glory and path to ruination conjoined.